I should clarify; when you pipe a word that's an or.
So strictly speaking in the last three I put up there the pattern before the pipe matches anything with starting with the word that has something else after it, and after the pipe it matches the word itself.
I'm sure there's a more elegant way to do it but I'm not an expert in regex...
I'm sorry for the delay. We expect a first public beta within the next month or two. Stay tuned...
Since I came to RoyalTS from using Mobaxterm, I was spoiled by its syntax highlighting of words that were built-in. Does anyone have a similar regex and is willing to share, to apply this to RoyalTS?
Hi Adam,
you are right, this is only available for Rebex based connections. The reason we cannot support that for PuTTY based connection is simply because PuTTY does not support that feature. The way PuTTY is integrated is very simple and we actually just start PuTTY.exe. If PuTTY implements this feature and we can control is by writing the configuration to the registry as we do with all the other PuTTY settings, we can also enable this for PuTTY.
Switching your existing connections from PuTTY to Rebex in bulk is quite simple. Check out this short videos on how to use the dashboard and the bulk-edit feature:
https://www.royalapplications.com/go/kb-ts-win-folderdashboard
https://www.royalapplications.com/go/kb-ts-win-bulkedit
For new objects, use the Aplication -> Default Sertings folder to setup all the default values.
Let me know if this helps.
Regards,
Stefan
We have a rough prototype ready but it's not yet production quality. As mentioned above it will be part of the next major release but this will take a while. We will probably have a beta with the feature included in a couple of months...
I'm sorry I can't be more specific.
To make it clear: it's the highlighting of keywords that I'm talking about.
Hi Adam,
you first need to go to the "Plugin" page in the properties and change the active plugin to "Rebex". After that you need to re-open the bulk-edit dialog. Let me know if this helps.
Regards,
Stefan
As |^err(\w*) is not working - you can add space before err and then it will not highlight overruns ie.
(?i)disable(\w*)|fail(\w*)| err(\w*)
Could be? I'm using 5.0.11009 and it is working for me. Is there a specific word that isn't working?
This isn't working in my RTS:
(¨( *)?no | down |[^A-Za-z0-9](disabl(\w*)|fault|shutdown|disconnected|err(\w*)|ERR(\w*)|fail(\w*)|denied|not permitted|disallowed|not allowed|refused|problem|not permitted|notconnect)[^A-Za-z0-9])
I'm not using the latest version though, could that be an issue?
Actually, I think this might be better:
(?i)disable(\w*)|fail(\w*)
This should cover all iterations with the words in them. I'm struggling with 'err' though.
(?im)^err(\w*)
This should cover everything that begins with "err" case insensitive. However, it isn't working in RTS for me.
You could use:
(?i)err(\w*)
or have a single line:
(?i)disable(\w*)|fail(\w*)|err(\w*)
But this will catch anything with err in the string.
It will catch "err", "error" but will also catch "overruns" because it has "err" in it. So it will catch anything with "err" anywhere in the word.
Not sure how Royal implemented regex, but I haven't been able to figure out how to do start string matches yet.
I think you can take out all but the first (?i) if you use that as a single string.
Something like:
(?i)err(\w+)|err|disable(\w+)|disable|fail(\w+)|fail
Definitely not more elegant, but a bit shorter and should be functional? I would need to test it out.
Alright, I got a new one...it's more complected but also includes more options. I grabbed the major sytax from another vendor, but it seems to work with RTS:
(¨( *)?no | down |[^A-Za-z0-9](disabl(\w*)|fault|shutdown|disconnected|err(\w*)|ERR(\w*)|fail(\w*)|denied|not permitted|disallowed|not allowed|refused|problem|not permitted|notconnect)[^A-Za-z0-9])
You can take out or add anything between the first set of parentheses after the "[^A-Za-z0-9]".
The first "| down |" only matches the string "down" with a space before and after. You can exclude that entirely if you want.
ROEGIERS JEROEN
Dear,
it would be very helpfull if you could make it so that certain words in SSH session get a color.
It would also be nice if you could choose those words and colors freely or use a template such as 'Cisco network devices' or 'Linux distributions'.
Your competitors such as MobaXterm and Devolutions already have this possibility.
Thanks and keep up the good work!
5 people like this idea